NORWAYThe spouses may enter into binding agreements on maintenance and other matters before or after divorce or during divorce proceedings. See (z.B Marriage Act of Norway, § 83. A spouse may agree to waive his or her future alimony as long as this is not the case with a view to a hypothetical future divorce. AUSTRALIA Contractsprenuptial, known as binding financial agreements, were first implemented in Australia in 2000 with the passage of the Family Law Amendment Act 2000. Part VIIIA of the Family Law Act contains special provisions concerning the review of these agreements by family law lawyers. For a binding financial agreement to be binding, it must be signed in writing by both parties; a copy is given to one party (the original) and to the other; an indication of the extent of the maintenance of the spouses; and declare that both parties have received specific independent legal advice and that they have received a certificate from independent counsel. If you`re considering a marriage or estate contract, talk to the Rayden Solicitors team for expert advice. Our team has extensive experience in marriage contracts, both with UK assets and with overseas assets. A marriage contract is an agreement between two parties before the marriage. It can be used to determine how the couple wants their wealth to be divided between them if they separate or divorce afterwards. The selection clauses of the forums are widely validated by the Japanese courts. Their validity in marriage contracts excluding the jurisdiction of the Japanese courts is likely to be maintained if the case in question does not fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Japanese courts and if, under the legislation in force in that forum, the court designated in the agreement was independent of the jurisdiction in the matter. In India, marriage contracts are very rare and have no laws in force.

However, with rising divorce rates, people are becoming more and more interested in it. Some lawyers believe that prenups in India have no legal sanctity. However, in some cases, some form of contract is signed, usually among affluent citizens. But agreements must be reasonable and not violate existing laws such as the Hindu Marriage Act. Indian courts allow the signing of a settlement protocol during divorces. But no court has yet been asked to impose a prenup. [6] Currently, 28 states and the District of Columbia have adopted a version of the Uniform Premarital Agreement Act (UPAA) or the Updated Premarital Agreements Act (UPMAA). The UPAA was adopted in 1983 by the Uniform Law Commission (ULC) to promote greater uniformity and predictability between state laws regarding these contracts in an increasingly ephemeral society. .

. .